Tanglewood Case 5 Historical Hiring and furtherance Data: Applicant Flows occupational home| | | Total | smock*| Total Non-White| African-American*| fork out Associates| foreign hires| Applicants| 18226| 15436| 2790| 594| | | Hires| 3832| 3221| 611| 135| | | pickax proportionality| 21.02%| 20.87%| 21.90%| 22.73%| | | | | | | | Shift attracter| External hires| Applicants| 392| 320| 72| 17| Â | Â | Hires| 61| 54| 7| 2| Â | Â | excerpt proportion| 15.56%| 16.88%| 9.72| 11.76| Â | internal hires| Applicants| 864| 712| 152| 30| Â | Â | Hires| 280| 241| 39| 6| Â | Â | Selection symmetry| 32.41%| 33.85| 25.66| 20| | | | | | | | Department jitney| External hires| Applicants| 1242| 1074| 168| 44| | | Hires| 94| 82| 12| 3| | | Selection balance| 7.57%| 7.64%| 7.14| 6.82| | immanent hires| Applicants| 589| 509 | 80| 21 | | | Hires| 124| 108 | 16| 3 | | | Selection ratio| 21.05%| 21.22| 20| 14.29| | | | | | | | Asst. store passenger car| External hires| Applicants| 146| 123| 23| 7| Â | Â | Hires| 17| 15| 2| 0| Â | Â | Selection ratio| 11.64%| 8.2| 8.
70| 0| Â | inner hires| Applicants| 108| 90 | 18| 4 | Â | Â | Hires| 27| 25 | 2| 1 | Â | Â | Selection ratio| 25.00%| 27.80| 11.11| 25| | | | | | | | Store managing director| External hires| Applicants| 50| 42| 8| 2| | | Hires| 5| 4| 1| 0| | | Selection ratio| 10.00%| 9.52| 12.5| 0| | Internal hires| Applicants| 81| 66| 15| 4| | | Hires| 13| 9| 4| 0| | | Selection ratio| 16.05%| 13.64| 26.67| 0| *Non-Hispanic A.)The map above shows the cream ratios by each pipeline category for positions at Tanglewood. fit in to the chart some positions argue different discrimination fit to the four fifths...If you want to conquer a full essay, put it on our website:
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment