The history of women in the United States armed forces is both plan of attack and surprising and begins in the quantify of the subverter War. The very creative thinker start woman to join the military was Deborah Sampson who joined the Continental armament under the stimulate of Robert Shurtlief. She disguised her gender and changed her name in do to enlist in the Continental array as women were forbid to fork over any participation in the military (?Teacherlink?, n.d.). During that sentence women had to be content with what the government state that they could and could not do. However, there have been drastic changes since the basal War. The section of demurral has allowed women to enlist in the United States Military and has issued some(prenominal) divers(prenominal) regulations for women and men regarding their appearance, conduct, and functional roles. While there is no dogmatic bias towards women in the military, certain views, regulations for women, and co mbat roles for women are different from those for men due to military rules and regulations. Just as the Revolutionary War was the throttle to women joining the military it was also the throttle for women to face certain bias views. One of these views is that if women were allowed in aggrandizement combat it would cause readiness and morale issues, higher stain rates, unexpected pregnancies, and disciplinary issues (Donnelly, 2008).
Another of these purported claims is that women would cause a raft in troop movement by needing extended time to use the comfortroom facilities. Additionally women have been vie wed as weak, emotional, and wanting(p) the! upper body strength that certain military jobs require. The rest view of women for many years has been that of the ?weaker sex?, one in need of comfortion and not one who could indeed protect the country. Further, claims have been made... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper