Deontological Vs Utilitarian Ethics Essay

Kant believed that cleanity is aquiline upon reason, that to proceed rationally was the same as acting morally. He placed a high value upon vocation in determining the moral cost of an action. Kants deontological ethics is essentially an ethics of business or obligation. As such, he claims that the moral worth of an action depends solely on whether or not it was make merely from a sense of duty. If an act is done simply because one is so wedded, the act has no moral value. This principle holds received even if inclination happens to be in agreement with duty. To illustrate this point, he uses the role model of a truly beneficent person.He says that while forgivingness to all hu mankindness is a duty, there are some(a) who are course inclined to be kind. He asserts But I discover that in such a study an action of this kind, however proper, however advantageously-natured it may be, has nevertheless no dead on target moral worth, but is on a level with other inclinatio ns (Gregory and Giancola, 82). When these spread kindness while motivated by their proclaim inclination to be kind, their kind acts be in possession of no moral value, because in his office in order for an act to be moral, it must be done for the pursuit of duty alone. Essentially, deontological ethics says the less inclined one is to perform an act that duty calls one to, the more moral worth the act has.While deontological ethics is altogether independent of inclination, utile ethics is in many was based upon it. Utilitarianism is built on hedonism, which is the claim that pastime is the supreme good for man. The main idea of utilitarianism is that man is naturally inclined to seek pleasure and keep off pain and this natural inclination is to be embraced as it will lead man to the supreme end, which is happiness. Utilitarian ethics says that moral acts are those that promote pleasure and rescind pain while immoral acts do the opposite. In is definition of utilitarianism, John move says that as far as possible, pleasure in its highest quantity and quality should be promoted and this for the great number of people possible. He says, that standard is not the agents own greatest happiness, but the greatest amount of happiness altogether (Gregory and Giancola, 92). In my view this means that according to utilitarian ethics, the moral act is the one that brings pleasure to the greatest amount of people.